When I was in high school, my mother found her signature written over and over again on one of my Mead notebook pages. She was confused at first since she didn’t remember signing her name repeatedly down the blue-lined page. She realized almost immediately that she hadn’t done the handiwork; I had.
It was my attempt to get her signature down pitch-perfect (which, I can still do) so that I could sign tardy and absentee notes whenever necessary. While my grade school days were spent doing whatever I could to be the teacher’s pet; my later high school years were spent doing the least amount of work necessary to stay above the curve so that I could hang with friends inside and mostly outside of school.
From my experience, no matter how strong of a start a kid gets with school, it’s a work of epic proportions to keep most of them engaged and performing at their educational peak. The task takes more than a loving and committed parent. It takes compassionate and patient teachers, an enthusiastic and well-run school system, and a community that puts education at the top of its priority list.
If my mom had told me that I was not going to school because the President of the United States was going to give a speech that included language and politics that she disagreed with, it would have set a precedent. If there was the slightest chance that whoever was addressing me and my class, even if it was the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, may say something that was in opposition to my parent’s beliefs, I could take pass. I would have thought it weird in sixth grade, but used it as the ace in my back pocket come eleventh grade.
College admissions counselors, the local police department’s drunk driving awareness spokesperson, past state reps showing up to my American politics class to explain state government ... they all would have been tagged socialists in hopes that I could have another day off to do anything besides go to school.
Of course, my education would have suffered more than it already did and I would have been penalized in the long run when it came time for the college application process. (I doubt most colleges would have tolerated excessive absences due to “fear of socialism.”)
Anyone who claims that it’s a good idea to keep your child home from school because the President of the United States is going to make a 20-minute speech to grade-schoolers does not have your child’s best interest at heart.
If you want your child to achieve and succeed and be a competitive contender when it comes time for the college enrollment forms, then they need to stay in school-not out of it. If you disagree with what the President says, tell your child that you disagree and explain why. Let them know that your greatest hope is that they can help make a change for what you believe would be a better America. Teach them, inform them, make them part of the conversation.
Personally, I’m shocked that any parent would consider pulling their child out of school because the President of the United States wants to make a speech endorsing a positive educational experience.
Instead of pulling them out, why not send them to school with your own study sheet. Questions could include inquiries on socialist thought, like: What are the fundamental beliefs of a socialist government? How long does it take a cultural to transform from a capitalistic society into a socialist nation? Why is socialism anti-American and what can I do to avoid socialistic measures?
Most likely you’ll need a government scholar to help with your child’s essay, but it’s a start. If you’re scared of socialism, then the best measure to take would be to learn the details and pitfalls related to a socialistic society, right? I mean, you don’t want to throw around a word like “socialism” without knowing exactly what it means, right? You want to be an informed and educated parent who says things based on facts and not vitriolic monologues dished out by angry, paranoid ideologues who are more into ratings than your child’s education ... right?
Amy Gesenhues is a freelance writer who lives in Floyd County. You can read her daily commentaries at www.AmyWroteIt.Wordpress.com. E-mail her directly at amy@amywroteit.com.
Columns
Related Photos
Discussion
GESENHUES: A conservative ate my homework
- Columns
-
-
CLERE: Walkout is absurd
The walkout by Indiana House Democrats entered its third week yesterday as tensions continued to rise and misinformation proliferated.
-
LADD: New Albany has new energy
New Albany is evolving. Public art has become more prevalent in the downtown, drawing more locals and outside visitors to our community; bringing more publicity.
-
HOWEY: Brooks, Walorski take aim at GOP glass ceiling
Susan Brooks’ 5th District campaign conducted internal polling in mid-April and the news was disheartening. She trailed the frontrunner — former congressman David McIntosh — by 20 points. Twenty points?
-
CUMMINS: Life was simpler before the iStuff
God set up a time line for us, which encompasses the past, the present and the future. You can’t escape any of these. If you’re here, there or somewhere, you have a past and a future, but you’re actually, at this moment, living in the present and you’re probably holding something in your hand.
-
HAYDEN: Readers respond to voter turnout question
Like others who contacted me, she said she was weary of nasty campaigns and worn out by news of corrupt politicians.
Here’s why she did make the effort: “I try to focus on all the women who sacrificed so much for women to be able to vote, and for the privilege of living in a country where we are free to vote as we choose.” -
DODD: Paying unfairly for the past
-
STAWAR: Can parents attach too much?
On this issue there is even more disagreement. While attached bassinets are considered to be fine, co-sleeping, is opposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The possibility of accidentally suffocating or crushing the infant and an increased risk for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has been often cited as a reason to avoid this practice.
-
HARBESON: The compromising nature of compromise
But there’s nothing inherently wrong with the concept of compromise. This is simply an example of how government coercion can skew and twist any concept beyond its original meaning and purpose.
-
RESCHKE: My Amazing Ohio River Bridges Project Plan
The point of sharing this memory is that once we have tolls, they will be there for as long as the bridges exist and the dollar price for frequent commuters that’s been proposed is the cheapest those tolls will ever be.
-
MOORE: The system can still work
On the local scene, services like Jerry Westmoreland’s recovery services, Bliss House, the Drug Courts (adult and juvenile) and the like are proper uses of this alcohol and drug fund money. Families in need due to a member having an addiction that affects all of them seem appropriate beneficiaries, too.
- More Columns Headlines
-
Robin Gibb of Bee Gees Dies at 62
Protesters, Police Clash at NATO Summit
Raw Video: NATO Protesters Face-off With Police
Libyan Convicted in Lockerbie Bombing Is Dead
NATO Chief: 'No Rush for Exits' in Afghanistan.
Obama Pushes for Post-2014 Vision for Afghanista
Raw Video: Demonstrations Ahead of NATO Summit
Raw Video: Powerful Quake in Northern Italy
G-8 Seeks Unity on Euro-debt Crisis, Iran
Mary Kennedy Mourned at Private Funeral in NY
Prosecutors: Trio Planned to Attack Obama's HQ
Blind Chinese Activist Arrives in NY
G-8 Leaders Hope Greece Remains in Eurozone
SpaceX President: 'This Is Not Failure'
Blind Chinese Activist Leaves for US
Raw Video: Obama Greets Leaders at Camp David
Big Job: G-8 Tackles Euro Crisis
Raw Video: SpaceX Rocket Launch Aborted in Fla.
Video Surfaces of Alleged Abuse at Kansas School
Verizon to End Unlimited Data Plans
