My husband has a partially-torn muscle in his leg. We have no idea what this means right now except that he limps and has more trouble than usual chasing our 1-month-old son.
Tomorrow he is taking his MRI films to a specialist and we will know more. Tonight, I asked him if he could take our kindergartener to school the day after his doctor’s visit.
“Sure, unless I have to have surgery,” he told me.
I, being a less-than-sympathetic wife at the time, responded with a roll of my eyes and a slightly-under-my-breath, “Whatever.” My thought was that of course they wouldn’t schedule surgery the very next day. I mean, they could, but really; it’s a partially-torn muscle, not a malfunctioning kidney. We don’t even know if surgery is necessary.
His answer and my reaction led to one of our more heated kitchen discussions. His stance: I can’t believe you would ask me to put-off surgery so I can take our daughter to school while you get coffee with a friend? My stance: Why do you always have a, “yes, but ... ” reply when I ask you for a favor? Yada, yada, yada.
And so goes the health care reform debate.
For political pundits, it’s not about the bill. The debate is more about debating (and ratings) than it is about health care. Ideologies, buzzwords and insults are being thrown back and forth, with words like “socialism,” and “death panels,” and references to Nazi-Germany infecting the airwaves.
Where is the elevated discussion about how the bill will affect our immediate health care situation? All I hear is rhetoric meant to scare audiences and grow viewership.
While the cable news shows spend their programming throwing mud at the Capitol Building, the politicians inside appear to be standing staunchly on opposite sides of the table; one side demanding, “We’ll get this through without you,” with the other side raising their fists and yelling back, “Not on our watch.”
The pundits and politicians may as well be in our kitchen with us fighting about whether or not I think my husband should put off surgery so that I can go to coffee with friend. The fact is, it doesn’t matter who is right or wrong in either of these debates because there is no right or wrong. We are all arguing completely separate points.
This is why the fight keeps going. How can there be a resolution when you are arguing two totally different details? Democrats keep yelling about health care, while republicans keep yelling about costs. Both sides want what’s best (or what they have determined is best), but one side wants what is best for our health care policies and the other side wants what is best for our economic policies. Two equally important, but equally separate agendas.
Former democratic senator and once-upon-a-time professional basketball player Bill Bradley wrote an op-ed column about the health care debate for the New York Times last week. Mr. Bradley confirmed that he believed, “ ... a grand bipartisan compromise is still possible with health care.” His answer was clear and made sense, “The bipartisan trade-off in a viable health care bill is obvious: Combine universal coverage with malpractice tort reform in health care.”
Wow, I thought when I read his column; his commentary made sense and in no way scared me that I may or may not be put in front of a death panel one day (not that I was ever that fearful). So what if I’m a bleeding heart liberal? I respect that my fellow conservative republicans want to keep an eye on the money.
The legislative process is messy and not for the weak at heart (or stomach). If everything works the way it’s supposed to, the bipartisan negotiations within the legislative process can be a successful means to an eventual end somewhere in the middle.
The fighting and fear-mongering being perpetuated by extremist and talk show hosts work against the greater good for all of us. If we could hear this debate without the hateful, sarcastic, and often false rhetoric, more of us might be showing up to town hall meetings to listen and speak our concerns instead of staying home to avoid the bullies who are showing up with pictures of Hitler and semi-automatic assault rifles.
Amy Gesenhues is a freelance writer in Floyd County. You can read her daily commentaries at www.AmyWroteIt.Wordpress.com or email her at amy@amywroteit.com.
Columns
Speaking of health care
- Columns
-
-
CLERE: Walkout is absurd
The walkout by Indiana House Democrats entered its third week yesterday as tensions continued to rise and misinformation proliferated.
-
LADD: New Albany has new energy
New Albany is evolving. Public art has become more prevalent in the downtown, drawing more locals and outside visitors to our community; bringing more publicity.
-
STAWAR: The souvenir state of America
Recently, my wife Diane and I spent the day aboard the Belle of Cincinnati with our daughter’s family. We all had a good time, even though the diesel-powered Cincinnati attraction isn’t a real steamboat, like our own Belle of Louisville, and despite the fact that it poured down rain the whole time.
-
NASH: Making a Memorial vacation
Memorial Day weekend is upon us which brings us to the start of the summer travel season. With the mild winter we had around here most schools didn’t have much in terms of snow make-up days so many kids have already finished up their semesters and are ready to get on with their holiday. Not to worry parents it will only be a couple of weeks before the back-to-school sales kick in and in no time at all it will be time for those youngsters to go back.
-
HARBESON: A handy little idea
After having worked hard the past few months, I now have something new to add to my resume — “I was Lead Project Manager for a major construction venture, supervising every aspect in the creation of a privately funded community building.”
-
MORRIS: Nancy Hogan was more than just an employee
Pulling into The Tribune parking lot each morning was pretty uneventful in the old days. Nothing good happens between 5:30 and 6 a.m. Nothing at all.
-
HAMILTON: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year. A confluence of deadlines and policy triggers unlike anything I can remember in a half-century of public life will produce massive budget cuts and serious tax increases amounting to a 3.5 percent hit on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product.
-
BEAM: Lost memories found
As time elapses, so do our memories. I forget things now. I can’t remember his height. How did he curl his lips into that sardonic, wholehearted smile? I only recall flashes of a moment. Wearing his jacket at prom. His golf clubs in the back of his old, golden car. Notes passed in the hallway. Listening to Boys to Men in his basement.
-
STANCZYKIEWICZ: A gift for mom and dad
Two strategies for parents are important. First, parents need to model for children how to disagree. “When you’re talking with your spouse and you’re whining and complaining and nagging, you shouldn’t be too surprised when your young person does the same thing,” Allen said. “We need to be good role models.”
-
HOWEY: Brooks, Walorski take aim at GOP glass ceiling
Susan Brooks’ 5th District campaign conducted internal polling in mid-April and the news was disheartening. She trailed the frontrunner — former congressman David McIntosh — by 20 points. Twenty points?
- More Columns Headlines
-



