Numbers are not my thing. I do math about as well as I drive. So me commenting on the logistics of our nation’s economy is a bit like me teaching driver’s ed. Of course, that’s not going to stop me from lamenting on our national numbers (or lack thereof), I just want to say from the start not to expect a Warren Buffet-style commentary.
Here is what I figure: over the last decade, organizations that had money to lend were selling the American dream. People were purchasing homes they couldn’t afford and buying things on credit that they didn’t need. Two-car garages were filled with shiny new cars; homes were filled with new furniture that was financed without interest for years to come. Photo books were stuffed with pictures from vacations all bought on plastic.
Is this what happened? Did the race to the American dream cause this national nightmare? Oh the irony, right?
I can’t imagine that this is what my grandparents had in mind for our generation when they were literally saving pennies to escape the depression. My grandmother does not buy anything on credit. I can’t imagine a world without it.
And now what do we do for our children’s children? I know my trips to Target to fill my red cart with stuff I could live without is not helping; even though, our government’s $700 billion answer says spending is just what we need. From the bailouts back in September to the stimulus plan that was signed last week, the solution is all about spending. But is our government spending different than me not saving? It’s all so confusing to me.
The kicker is that we have to trust people (our President and the US Congress) who don’t know if they know answer but still keep writing checks to companies (AIG, Bank of America, Citigroup) that don’t know how best to spend it. And these companies are a mess. They handle money about as well as I do.
The difference is that they are mismanaging millions and billions of dollars that they didn’t even earn. It’s all bailout money-money that our government is borrowing from my children’s generation in the hopes that there will still be a national economy when daughter’s pre-school class hits the job market. And worse still, these companies that are receiving the bailout billions are money management firms! They are in the business of managing money.
John Thain spent more than a million dollars to renovate his office and continued to hand out million dollar bonuses to employees who had obviously failed when his company, Merrill Lynch, had to merge with Bank of America. And then there was Citigroup who received $45 billion from the bailout and thought maybe they should squeeze in the purchase of a $50 million dollar corporate jet with their new found funds.
All of these spending tactics are a little bit like thinking, “I don’t have enough to pay my mortgage so I’m just going to drop what I do have on a $200 dinner at Jeff Ruby’s.” We don’t have enough to cover the things we need, so we spend what we do have on empty purchases meant to fill a gaping gap that just stays hungry.
Spending money that you do not have only feels good at the moment it happens. Depending on how much you spend (and how much you have), buyer’s remorse can set in as early as the car ride home-or, in the case of these corporate expenditures, on the corporate jet-ride back to the million dollar office.
All of this spending brings me back around to the solution of why spending more to save our collective assets is the answer. Theoretically, it seems like spending is exactly why we are in this place to begin with. I have a picture in my head of everybody running down a steep hill and gaining so much momentum that we are all out of control. But to keep from falling and wiping each other out, we have to keep running as fast as we can until we gain control and are headed in an upward direction.
The scariest part is that we don’t know how steep this hill is. Are we close to the bottom yet? Or do we have a ways to go before we start back up again? And how many are we going to lose on the way down? Sprinting with our eyes closed is a dangerous race. My hope is that we finish on steady ground. And maybe teach our children that this race to the American dream isn’t a race at all, but a way of life that doesn’t include credit cards, unnecessary things, and shopping sprees.
Columns
GESENHUES: Bailout blues
- Columns
-
-
CLERE: Walkout is absurd
The walkout by Indiana House Democrats entered its third week yesterday as tensions continued to rise and misinformation proliferated.
-
LADD: New Albany has new energy
New Albany is evolving. Public art has become more prevalent in the downtown, drawing more locals and outside visitors to our community; bringing more publicity.
-
HARBESON: The compromising nature of compromise
But there’s nothing inherently wrong with the concept of compromise. This is simply an example of how government coercion can skew and twist any concept beyond its original meaning and purpose.
-
RESCHKE: My Amazing Ohio River Bridges Project Plan
The point of sharing this memory is that once we have tolls, they will be there for as long as the bridges exist and the dollar price for frequent commuters that’s been proposed is the cheapest those tolls will ever be.
-
MOORE: The system can still work
On the local scene, services like Jerry Westmoreland’s recovery services, Bliss House, the Drug Courts (adult and juvenile) and the like are proper uses of this alcohol and drug fund money. Families in need due to a member having an addiction that affects all of them seem appropriate beneficiaries, too.
-
BEAM: As ‘Time’ goes by: A magazine’s maternal ploy
What does disgust me is the way Time used the cover photo to paint an inaccurate picture of attachment parenting and, some could argue, motherhood.
-
HAYDEN: For many, voting didn’t count for much
Three-fourths of Indiana voters who did vote, did so in the Republican primary. That makes sense: The Lugar-Mourdock contest was the marquee race, so plenty of Democrats sat it out.
-
HOWEY: Mourdock, Donnelly and the great divide
An hour after Mourdock made that explanation, U.S. Rep. Joe Donnelly met with reporters at Ralph’s Great Divide restaurant. Donnelly insisted the site was chosen because “they have great meatloaf,” but used the place as a metaphor that the contrast between him and Mourdock “cannot be clearer.”
-
CUMMINS: Where did the Sabbath day go?
In the old days the little towns and rural areas across America, the churches were a vital part of our lives. They were sacred places where we received moral instruction and guidance.
-
DODD: The total package
One of the character traits anyone must possess in order to have a happy, fulfilled life is to know your own strengths. Even more important is to know your weaknesses and shortcomings. If you don’t think you have any or don’t recognize your own, someday after you get married they will be made imminently clear to you.
- More Columns Headlines
-



