HuffingtonPost.com is running a series of articles by life-coach-slash-author, Marcus Buckingham, who happens to be a male writing about women and their lack of happiness. According to several cited studies, the trend is that our happiness over the last three decades makes for a downward sloping line graph.
Even though women have experienced, “ ... greater educational, political, and employment opportunities,” their overall happiness is suffering. According to Buckingham, “Over the last few decades, women, in comparison to men, have become less happy with their lives.” Per his findings, “As women get older, they get sadder.”
First, let me allow my lefty-liberal side a quick moment to wag her finger at HuffingtonPost.com for running the piece in the first place. As a liberally-slanted news site, why publish anything that fuels the most right-winged conservative theorists who claim our world was better off when women were without shoes and in the process of creating life? Please, let’s not give certain radio show hosts more fat to chew on.
Second, even after reading the entire article twice, I’m still not buying how they are defining happiness. While, “Greater educational, political, and employment opportunities,” may lead to greater happiness at first glance, the real outcome of such opportunities is greater gratification. Which begs the question, does doing the daily work it takes to be more gratified over the course of a lifetime result in day-to-day happiness?
My initial thought was that we’re not less happy, but simply more aware of all that is available to us on an emotional, mental and physical level. It’s easier to be less satisfied when there are more options to choose from ... right? (And, just so you know, when I refer to “we” I’m talking about all women-folk.)
But then I thought, wait, it’s not that we have too many options that render us blue; it’s that our definition of happiness is always evolving.
Maybe sometime in the early sixties, women were happy with a husband who had a good job and house with a couple household appliances. We had washers and dryers and vacuums to follow behind in our high-heels and freshly-ironed, crisp, white, cotton aprons.
The 1970s came along and our happiness included a college degree with a macrame chair. We could live with or without the husband as long as we had an eight-track player in our original (but slightly used) Volkswagon bugs and Nissan Datsuns. We had our Erica Jong and Betty Friedan books under one arm and our Ms. Magazine under the other.
And then the ’80s happened and there was all that cocaine and big hair and shoulder pads and no one was happy about that.
Finally, the ’90s showed up and we were intent on having it all. (And now when I say we, I’m talking about me and my peers ... all of us girls who fell hard for Duran Duran and wore Tretorns to school.) Going to college wasn’t about making a political statement; it simply was what we were supposed to do. Few of us thought, “I’m going to be the first women to...” Our mothers had already started the journey to make most of those professional and political leaps for us.
What my generation didn’t know is that 33 percent of us who became wives would out-earn our spouses. And while our spouses are much more likely to contribute to domestic duties than their fathers, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics cites that the division of household labor is still lopsided: 65 percent of women are cooking versus 38 percent of the men; 50 percent of women are doing the housework versus 20 percent of men; and in homes with children under the age of six, women are spending 1.2 hours a day providing physical care to their kiddos whereas men are giving less than half an hour worth of their time.
What we didn’t know is that our belief that we could have it all without having a nervous breakdown was slightly frayed at the edges.
Now, at this very moment, we are just figuring out that having it all is hard. It leaves us without sleep, with unused gym memberships, with guilt about not feeding our kids enough fruit (and not just fruit, but locally grown fruit from a farmers market where we have to rise early on a Saturday morning — the only day we have to sleep in — so that we get there in time to choose from whatever hand-picked peaches are still available.)
Maybe our lack of happiness is simple, hardcore exhaustion.
Maybe all we need is a good, long, uninterrupted nap right smack in the middle of a Wednesday.
Amy Gesenhues is a freelance writer who lives in Floyd County. You can read her daily commentaries at www.AmyWroteIt.Wordpress.com. E-mail her directly at amy@amywroteit.com.
Columns
GESENHUES: Exhaustion blues
- Columns
-
-
CLERE: Walkout is absurd
The walkout by Indiana House Democrats entered its third week yesterday as tensions continued to rise and misinformation proliferated.
-
LADD: New Albany has new energy
New Albany is evolving. Public art has become more prevalent in the downtown, drawing more locals and outside visitors to our community; bringing more publicity.
-
HOWEY: Brooks, Walorski take aim at GOP glass ceiling
Susan Brooks’ 5th District campaign conducted internal polling in mid-April and the news was disheartening. She trailed the frontrunner — former congressman David McIntosh — by 20 points. Twenty points?
-
CUMMINS: Life was simpler before the iStuff
God set up a time line for us, which encompasses the past, the present and the future. You can’t escape any of these. If you’re here, there or somewhere, you have a past and a future, but you’re actually, at this moment, living in the present and you’re probably holding something in your hand.
-
HAYDEN: Readers respond to voter turnout question
Like others who contacted me, she said she was weary of nasty campaigns and worn out by news of corrupt politicians.
Here’s why she did make the effort: “I try to focus on all the women who sacrificed so much for women to be able to vote, and for the privilege of living in a country where we are free to vote as we choose.” -
DODD: Paying unfairly for the past
-
STAWAR: Can parents attach too much?
On this issue there is even more disagreement. While attached bassinets are considered to be fine, co-sleeping, is opposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The possibility of accidentally suffocating or crushing the infant and an increased risk for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has been often cited as a reason to avoid this practice.
-
HARBESON: The compromising nature of compromise
But there’s nothing inherently wrong with the concept of compromise. This is simply an example of how government coercion can skew and twist any concept beyond its original meaning and purpose.
-
RESCHKE: My Amazing Ohio River Bridges Project Plan
The point of sharing this memory is that once we have tolls, they will be there for as long as the bridges exist and the dollar price for frequent commuters that’s been proposed is the cheapest those tolls will ever be.
-
MOORE: The system can still work
On the local scene, services like Jerry Westmoreland’s recovery services, Bliss House, the Drug Courts (adult and juvenile) and the like are proper uses of this alcohol and drug fund money. Families in need due to a member having an addiction that affects all of them seem appropriate beneficiaries, too.
- More Columns Headlines
-



