Federal stimulus money is flowing into Georgetown. As a result, the town’s sewage will stop flowing down the hill to New Albany. It’s a big win for both communities - and a benefit to the rest of Floyd County and Southern Indiana.
Last Wednesday, I announced a $3.5 million federal stimulus grant for Georgetown to build a wastewater treatment plant. I started pursuing the grant more than six months ago. That was in early spring, when hopes of receiving stimulus money were sprouting everywhere.
Now it’s fall, and the landscape is sparse, with many communities disappointed in their lack of success in reaping federal largesse.
I got behind Georgetown’s project because I saw it as a good way to leverage stimulus money for maximum benefit to my entire district, which includes most of Floyd County and a small part of Clark County.
Georgetown was a worthy applicant on its own, but there were many worthy applicants that didn’t receive funding. The additional benefits to New Albany and the rest of Floyd County and Southern Indiana made Georgetown’s project really stand out.
Georgetown does not have its own wastewater treatment plant. It contracts with New Albany for treatment, an arrangement that has become increasingly undesirable for both communities in recent years. Georgetown has 1,200 sewer customers and, under its contract with New Albany, can pump up to 226,000 gallons per day to New Albany.
With its own plant, Georgetown will no longer have to depend on New Albany, and New Albany will be free to pursue economic development, which has been limited by a lack of available treatment capacity.
New Albany will have the opportunity to generate millions of dollars in revenue from sewer tap-in fees. The resulting economic development will benefit New Albany and the rest of Southern Indiana for years to come. In addition, Floyd County had committed to help out with the cost of building a plant for Georgetown. Now that won’t be necessary, and every Floyd County taxpayer is off the hook.
Meanwhile, Georgetown’s sewer rates will decrease slightly, even after the cost of the new plant is taken into consideration. According to an analysis by an accounting firm, the average household’s monthly bill, based on 4,000 gallons, will decrease from $64.93 to $64.30. If the town had instead issued bonds to finance the new plant, the average bill would have increased to $81.85 to cover the cost of the debt service.
Many families use more than the average and already pay $100 or more per month. That’s bad enough; they certainly couldn’t afford to pay any more. The stimulus grant will save Georgetown residents from the financial burden of infrastructure improvements, and it helps prepare Georgetown for its own future economic growth.
I’ve received a lot of thanks and congratulations for securing the stimulus grant, but I would be remiss not to acknowledge others who helped make it possible. Sewage doesn’t flow along political lines, and I was pleased to be able to work with many other officials of both parties to make this happen.
Georgetown Town Council President Billy Stewart, a Democrat, played a key role and joined me in announcing the grant. We were in a room filled with Republicans and Democrats at the New Albany office of Georgetown Town Attorney D.A. Andrews, without whom there would have been no grant. Long before the stimulus came along, Stewart, Andrews and many other town and county officials were working hard to find a way to build a Georgetown plant.
Many issues had to be resolved in order to make Georgetown eligible for stimulus funding. Among other problems, Georgetown was bogged down in a legal dispute with Capitol Engineering, Inc., a subsidiary of Jeffersonville-based Hughes Group, Inc. with which Georgetown had contracted in 2006 to construct a plant. Because the town was unable to obtain the required zoning for the original site, construction was delayed indefinitely. Capitol had already completed design work and purchased equipment for the plant.
Georgetown and Capitol officials were skeptical - even resistant - when I brought them to the table to try to work out their differences. I helped them understand it was in their mutual interest to set aside the past and take advantage of the stimulus opportunity. The legal dispute went away, and now Capitol will build and operate the new plant on a site at the western edge of town.
By continuing under the existing, long-delayed contract with Capitol, we were able to streamline the process and position the project to be shovel ready, which made it eligible for stimulus funding.
The proper name for the federal stimulus is the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. It will distribute approximately $125 million to the Indiana State Revolving Fund, a program managed by the Indiana Finance Authority, an agency of state government. The finance authority makes money available to communities for wastewater and drinking water projects.
I disagree with much of the federal government’s approach to stimulating the economy, but if the feds are handing out money, I’m going to do everything I can to make sure we get our fair share in Southern Indiana.
It’s still fall, and the harvest isn’t over.
Columns
CLERE: Grant will boost entire community
- Columns
-
-
CLERE: Walkout is absurd
The walkout by Indiana House Democrats entered its third week yesterday as tensions continued to rise and misinformation proliferated.
-
LADD: New Albany has new energy
New Albany is evolving. Public art has become more prevalent in the downtown, drawing more locals and outside visitors to our community; bringing more publicity.
-
HOWEY: Brooks, Walorski take aim at GOP glass ceiling
Susan Brooks’ 5th District campaign conducted internal polling in mid-April and the news was disheartening. She trailed the frontrunner — former congressman David McIntosh — by 20 points. Twenty points?
-
CUMMINS: Life was simpler before the iStuff
God set up a time line for us, which encompasses the past, the present and the future. You can’t escape any of these. If you’re here, there or somewhere, you have a past and a future, but you’re actually, at this moment, living in the present and you’re probably holding something in your hand.
-
HAYDEN: Readers respond to voter turnout question
Like others who contacted me, she said she was weary of nasty campaigns and worn out by news of corrupt politicians.
Here’s why she did make the effort: “I try to focus on all the women who sacrificed so much for women to be able to vote, and for the privilege of living in a country where we are free to vote as we choose.” -
DODD: Paying unfairly for the past
-
STAWAR: Can parents attach too much?
On this issue there is even more disagreement. While attached bassinets are considered to be fine, co-sleeping, is opposed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The possibility of accidentally suffocating or crushing the infant and an increased risk for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has been often cited as a reason to avoid this practice.
-
HARBESON: The compromising nature of compromise
But there’s nothing inherently wrong with the concept of compromise. This is simply an example of how government coercion can skew and twist any concept beyond its original meaning and purpose.
-
RESCHKE: My Amazing Ohio River Bridges Project Plan
The point of sharing this memory is that once we have tolls, they will be there for as long as the bridges exist and the dollar price for frequent commuters that’s been proposed is the cheapest those tolls will ever be.
-
MOORE: The system can still work
On the local scene, services like Jerry Westmoreland’s recovery services, Bliss House, the Drug Courts (adult and juvenile) and the like are proper uses of this alcohol and drug fund money. Families in need due to a member having an addiction that affects all of them seem appropriate beneficiaries, too.
- More Columns Headlines
-



