> SOUTHERN INDIANA —
In this era of partisan confrontation and party-line votes on Capitol Hill, it’s easy to lose sight of why Congress exists. It is our vehicle for finding remedies to the problems that beset us. It does this by bringing people of different beliefs and ideologies together to discuss the issues, argue about their differences, explore possible solutions and then find common ground.
In this day and age, though, you have to ask: What if they can’t find common ground? What if it is simply not possible to arrive at an accommodation that commands a majority? Unfortunately, this is not uncommon these days.
To understand the answer, it’s important to recognize that in Congress, few things are ever decided for good. An effort that seems dead one day might be resurrected the next — or the following year, or even the following decade, as happened with health care reform.
I can remember endless discussions about allowing 18-year-olds to vote, with no resolution in sight, and then suddenly the constitutional amendment was approved. While it seemed impossible to reach a consensus at many moments in that long debate, members of Congress knew how to leave things in the best shape possible for making progress down the road — so when the time was right, they could pick the issue up again and reach a resolution.
This is why it’s not the disagreement itself that matters in Congress, it’s how you disagree. Harsh, unyielding, the-other-guy-is-always-wrong discord doesn’t leave much room for finding a way forward. But an effort to understand your opponents’ point of view, to make it clear that you recognize you merely have a difference of opinion, and to treat them with respect, makes it much more likely that, at another time, accommodation might be possible. It makes all the difference how the disagreement ends.
Congress is a very judgmental institution: its members are constantly weighing one another’s actions, behavior and attitudes. So they pay close attention to how their colleagues handle the conflict that is inevitable in a legislative body.
If an opponent on an issue is unpleasant, demeaning and angry, it’s unlikely that a legislator will want to work with him or her in the future. Other members, though, can be just as firm in their opposition but handle the disagreement in a way that makes one willing to go back and work with them on some other issue — or even, if enough time has gone by, on the same issue.
This is vital. In an institution like the Congress, no member can accomplish things alone; he or she must rely on the collaboration and cooperation of colleagues. Learning how to maintain good relations is crucial, because you never know when you’ll need someone’s help on an issue of importance to you. This is not easy to do, especially after heated and extended disagreement.
Yet, because the democratic process is, in fact, more about process than any particular legislative product, no conflict is ever final and no question is ever resolved permanently. As circumstances change, the voters’ understanding and feelings about an issue evolve, political alignments get shaken up, new information becomes available or reform becomes more urgent, issues that had been set aside for lack of common ground move back to the forefront. Often, the same players who were involved in them before are still around — but now are working together in a different environment.
So, for a member of Congress, taking the long view is of paramount importance. The plain truth is that every now and again, despite all the consensus-building skills that most politicians — and certainly the effective ones — develop over time, they’ll run into a major issue that can’t be resolved. What matters then is their perspective. If they recognize that at some point down the road they can come back to it, and treat one another as potential future partners, then progress, once impossible, becomes possible.
If they demonize one another and behave as though their opponents can only be lifelong enemies, then they’ll create their own self-fulfilling prophecy and prove unable to find the remedies they were elected to provide.
Lee Hamilton is Director of the Center on Congress at Indiana University. He was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives for 34 years.
Columns
Related Photos
-
Former congressman Lee Hamilton
Discussion
HAMILTON: In Congress, there’s always a next time
- Columns
-
-
CLERE: Walkout is absurd
The walkout by Indiana House Democrats entered its third week yesterday as tensions continued to rise and misinformation proliferated.
-
LADD: New Albany has new energy
New Albany is evolving. Public art has become more prevalent in the downtown, drawing more locals and outside visitors to our community; bringing more publicity.
-
CUMMINS: Are machines becoming more humane?
I can see it now. Load gobs of financial data into the massive bi-partisan federal computer, powerful enough to digest the national debt. Whatever it spits out, Congress could not filibuster, nor could the president veto it.
-
HAYDEN: More thoughts on the ‘no’ votes
Many said they didn’t vote in the primary because they didn’t want the tag that would come with it: In having to ask for either a Democratic or Republican ballot — as required in primary voting — they feared or loathed the idea of being seen as loyal to a party.
-
DODD: An unexpected Angel
-
STAWAR: The souvenir state of America
Recently, my wife Diane and I spent the day aboard the Belle of Cincinnati with our daughter’s family. We all had a good time, even though the diesel-powered Cincinnati attraction isn’t a real steamboat, like our own Belle of Louisville, and despite the fact that it poured down rain the whole time.
-
NASH: Making a Memorial vacation
Memorial Day weekend is upon us which brings us to the start of the summer travel season. With the mild winter we had around here most schools didn’t have much in terms of snow make-up days so many kids have already finished up their semesters and are ready to get on with their holiday. Not to worry parents it will only be a couple of weeks before the back-to-school sales kick in and in no time at all it will be time for those youngsters to go back.
-
HARBESON: A handy little idea
After having worked hard the past few months, I now have something new to add to my resume — “I was Lead Project Manager for a major construction venture, supervising every aspect in the creation of a privately funded community building.”
-
MORRIS: Nancy Hogan was more than just an employee
Pulling into The Tribune parking lot each morning was pretty uneventful in the old days. Nothing good happens between 5:30 and 6 a.m. Nothing at all.
-
HAMILTON: Is this really the best we can do?
As you know if you pay attention to national affairs, the United States faces a perfect fiscal storm at the end of this year. A confluence of deadlines and policy triggers unlike anything I can remember in a half-century of public life will produce massive budget cuts and serious tax increases amounting to a 3.5 percent hit on the nation’s Gross Domestic Product.
- More Columns Headlines
-
Raw Video: 19 Dead in Qatar Shopping Mall Fire
Beryl Makes Landfall on Florida Coast
Service Dogs Help Wash. Soldiers Battling PTSD
Raw Video: Heckler Bursts in on Blair Testimony
Japan Farmers Plant, Seek Radiation-free Rice
UN Blames Syrian Forces for Shelling Houla
Raw Video: Gay Protest Blocked in Moscow
Vatican in Chaos After Butler Arrested for Leaks
Jimmy Carter Endorses Egypt's Election Results
Biden Addresses West Point Graduating Class
Dozens of Children Killed in New Syria Attack
Raw Video: Activists Allege Massacre in Syria
NJ Man Charged With Murder in Death of Patz
Support, Fun for Kids of Fallen Soldiers at Camp
Fugitive Penguin Caught, Returned to Aquarium
50 Years Later, Underground Fire Still Burning
Light Show Transforms Sydney Opera House
Raw Video: Unruly Passenger Restrained in Miami
Raw Video: Robber Uses Drive-thru Window
Raw Video: Dragon Arrives at Space Station
