Apologies — what is so hard about them?
Either you get it and you’re sorry, or you don’t. But they don’t come with clauses and conditions.
I had a friend at ESPN who had a sign in her office that said, “Don’t ruin a good apology with an explanation.”
That pretty much sums it up. Either you’re sorry or you aren’t.
Athletes seem the worst at this. Andy Pettitte is the latest example. Named in the Major League Baseball report on steroids and HGH by George Mitchell, his apology was as follows:
“If what I did was an error in judgment on my part, I apologize.”
Amazing how powerful that two-letter word at the beginning is — if.
It changes the whole emotional impact of the statement. Leave it out and compare how much more powerful and sincere this reads:
“What I did was an error in judgment on my part. I apologize.”
Now that’s an apology.
The first one admits to no wrongdoing and almost blames the listener for getting upset.
It is like my two sons. When they get to fighting, as brothers do, eventually the older one will push the right button to really antagonize his younger sibling. The younger will resort to name-calling (which I will temper here for the family newspaper).
He will call his brother “stupid” and I will say, “hey, say you’re sorry to your brother,” and he’ll tell him, “OK, I am sorry. You are stupid.”
Isn’t that a little like the apology above?
Look how many apologies like that we have had in recent months.
So many that the Rev. Keith Menter, a Lutheran pastor, has declared them “non-apologies.” He writes, “I’m interested in apologies because so many high-profile public apologies are ‘non-apologies.’ A non-apology? How about, ‘I apologize if my actions offended you.’”
I am as disgusted with all the performance-enhancing usage in sports as any fan, but I think I would have more respect for a guy who used them if he actually came out and said, “Darn right, I used them. The whole league was using them and I felt I was falling behind everyone else, so I used them, too. I wish we didn’t have to resort to that, but I felt I did.”
At least that is sincere.
Pettitte even gets a little self-righteous in his apology.
He states, “If I have let down people that care about me, I am sorry. But I hope that you will listen to me carefully and understand that two days of perhaps bad judgment should not ruin a lifetime of hard work and dedication. I have tried to do things the right way my entire life, and, again, ask that you put those two days in the proper context.”
Again the “if,” and on top of that he almost feels victimized.
“OK, I used them, but I am not like those other guys who used them.”
It is what I used to call the “yeah, but” syndrome.
“You broke the rules? Yeah but, the other guys broke it worse ... or yeah but I only did it this one time and I had a good reason ... or yeah, but that rule is stupid.”
All of which may be true, but they aren’t apologies and they don’t give you a hall pass if you ignore rules. Nor should they.
It is why the Patriots were fined so seriously by the NFL earlier in the season.
Is the rule that they violated that big a deal in videotaping opponents defensive hand signals?
I don’t think so, but it is a rule, one the league warned them about not breaking, and they did it anyway. File that under the “Yeah, but the rules don’t apply to me” category.
I have never considered myself a hard-line rules and regulations guy. But as the “non-apology apology” permeates down to our youngest of athletes, I think it helps defeat one of the most appealing aspects of sport.
Sports always were, at their highest level, conducted with a it’s-the-same-for-everyone mentality. It was like, here are the rules ... we don’t care if you are rich or poor, black or white, Christian or Jew, American or European, old or young ... everyone plays by the same rules, and may the best man/woman/team win.
There is a charm in that, and a reassurance that at least somewhere in the world, you get what you earn. And you are defined by your actions. That seems to be dwindling.
I have met Andy Pettitte and I like him. He seems like a truly nice human being.
But humans make mistakes and break rules. His absurd apology should remind us how easy it is to offer non-apology apologies and “yeah, but ...” excuses for those mishaps.
We are a forgiving people.
Do we need those kinds of apologies? Do we need those “explanations.” Why can’t we just say “I’m sorry?”
Bob Valvano lives in Sellersburg and can be reached via e-mail at bobvshow@yahoo.com. He is a former college basketball coach and current radio show host on ESPN Radio.
Bobby Valvano Columns
December 19, 2007
VALVANO: Apologies are not that hard
- Bobby Valvano Columns
-
-
VALVANO: Apologies are not that hard
Apologies — what is so hard about them?
Either you get it and you’re sorry, or you don’t. But they don’t come with clauses and conditions.
I had a friend at ESPN who had a sign in her office that said, “Don’t ruin a good apology with an explanation.”
That pretty much sums it up. Either you’re sorry or you aren’t. -
VALVANO: Ohio girl reminds us of the good in sports
The producer for my radio show at ESPN calls 2007 “The Year of the Scandal.”
It is hard to argue with him.
We had Michael Vick and dogfighting, an NBA referee betting on games he officiated, former Tour De France winners voluntarily giving back their trophies for doping, and Marion Jones not so voluntarily giving her titles back for doping.
Also, we had more and more evidence stacking up to lead to an indictment against Barry Bonds for steroid use, the Patriots being levied the largest fine in the history of the league for “Spygate,” and top tennis players accused of throwing matches. -
VALVANO: IU football is a team we can all get behind
By beating Ball State last Saturday, they are bowl eligible. But I fear there will be a lot of six-win teams left home. The tiebreaker could be how well the teams travel (bowl games, after all, are first and foremost about making money), and IU is not known as a great “travel” team when it comes to football.
-
VALVANO: Tales of sports gone bad
We are used to seeing angry posts on sports Web sites. This, above all, seems to be the modus operandi of sports and sports coverage now.
-
VALVANO: Dampier is a new Bocce hero
My brother Jim used to like to tell this story.
When he was about nine years old, he and our older brother Nick, who was about 12 at the time, went to Yankee Stadium for one of the first times by themselves (I can't imagine the same woman, who raised me under such scrutiny in the relative hinterlands that was Long Island at that time, allowed my two brothers to take the subway from our home in Queens to the Bronx — by themselves — to see a baseball game, but she did.) -
VALVANO: Dye the man behind the courses
There are many reasons I like living here in Southern Indiana and I just got one more on Monday, and a memorable experience along the way.
Many golf fans know the name Pete Dye. He is one of the premier golf course designers in history, and at 81 years of age, is still a single digit handicapper. -
VALVANO: College football is a fraud
There are plenty of situations in life that seem to call for posing. You can’t go to an art gallery and simply blurt out, “I don’t get it.” You can’t listen to the obscure references of a Sheryl Crow or the late Jim Morrison of a generation ago, and openly point out that the lyrics make no sense.
-
VALVANO:New course has bite, but is still a gem
-
VALVANO: CWS lives up to its hype
OMAHA, Neb. — I used to wonder why there seemed to be such a cynicism from people who cover sports for a living. I mean most of them would tell you they got into it because they loved sports, perhaps played them growing up, and yet seem so jaded once they got “inside.”
-
VALVANO: Happy to be with my new teammates
Last week, I told you about the many lessons I learned during the experience of kicking in an actual Arena League Game for the Louisville Fire.
- More Bobby Valvano Columns Headlines
-



